
With Linux and ZFS, QuTS hero supports advanced data reduction technologies for further driving down costs and increasing reliablility of SSD (all-flash) storage. First, faster recovery if we talk about the availability of copies from 'snaps', and secondly, Snaptshot Replication will shorten your time to return to normal mode due to a potential disaster recovery scenario. After reading various reviews and having the ability to retrieve files without a Synology NAS (in the event of fire or theft), I decided to go with Glacier. There are two primary reasons why this package would be a better option than say Hyper Backup. QuTS hero is the operating system for high-end and enterprise QNAP NAS models. Ive been looking for a cheap external backup service for some time and have been chosing between Glacier/Amazon S3 and Synology C2 via Hyper Backup.

ago Yes, big difference, but I want to use hyperbackup not idrive backup as I trust it won't be going anywhere anytime soon.

#GLACIER VS HYPER VS HIDRIVE VS WINDOWS BACKUP SOFTWARE#
Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. It's somewhat on-par with other S3-based cloud backup services. IBM Cloud Object Storage using this comparison chart. WIth Linux and ext4, QTS enables reliable storage for everyone with versatile value-added features and apps, such as snapshots, Plex media servers, and easy access of your personal cloud. IDrive (5TB): 0.0013/GB/month IDrive Cloud (5TB): 0.0047/GB/month So IDrive Cloud is 3.6 times more expensive in this example. QTS is the operating system for entry- and mid-level QNAP NAS.
